Is your retirement ready for a 1970s redux?

A note from our friends at Priority Gold_SS(ad)

One Asset Gained 2,300%
The Last Time This Setup Happened
Here’s What It Was

Dear Reader,

From 1970 to 1980, one specific asset gained more than 2,300%.

That’s not a typo. A $10,000 investment became $230,000 in a decade.

And here’s why we’re bringing it up right now.

The exact same conditions that produced that gain in the 1970s are forming again today.

Stagflation. The toxic combination of high inflation AND a stalled economy. The 1970s version trapped the U.S. economy in a vise for nearly a decade. Stocks went sideways for 10 years. Bonds got crushed. Cash lost half its value.

Now look at where we are:

Inflation expectations spiked to 4.8%. JP Morgan and Moody’s are warning of recession by 2026. Oil is surging on Middle East tensions. And the Fed is trapped – cut rates and inflation worsens, hike rates and recession arrives faster.

The setup is identical.

Now we know what you’re thinking. “That was 50 years ago. It can’t happen again.”

The smartest money in the world disagrees.

Central banks are loading up on the same asset that gained 2,300% in the 1970s – at the fastest pace in 50 years. JP Morgan is forecasting it could hit $8,000 before this cycle ends.

You’re going to make a decision today whether you realize it or not.

Position before stagflation locks in. Or watch from the sidelines while the same trade plays out again.

Click here to get the free Wealth Preservation Guide – and see the 3 steps that worked for the 1970s winners.

Because once the trap closes, getting out gets expensive.

 
 
 
Bonus Article

CEG Is Down About 39% From Its High. The PPA Timeline Tells You Why.

Constellation Energy enters today’s Q3 earnings call carrying something genuinely unusual: multi-decade revenue contracts signed by the largest technology companies on the planet, a stock sitting about 39% below its October 2025 all-time high, and a Wall Street consensus that says the gap between those two facts is a buying opportunity.

The angle most coverage has missed is not the size of the deals. It is when the power actually flows.

Google’s 20-year PPA backs 890 MW of nuclear uprates across 11 Constellation units, with the first delivery expected by 2028. Amazon’s deal mirrors that structure: a 20-year PPA for 690 MW tied to a roughly 190 MW uprate at the Calvert Cliffs plant in Maryland, backed by more than $3 billion of investment, with new capacity scheduled to come online between 2030 and 2032. Meta’s deal, signed in June 2025, begins in June 2027 when Illinois’ ratepayer-funded zero-emission credit program expires.

That staggered delivery schedule creates a gap between today’s stock price and when contracted cash flows actually begin converting. Investors pricing CEG purely on announced deal volume are skipping the most important variable: the delivery clock.

Constellation has also signed an additional 920 MW of long-term PPAs with investment-grade customers. Those agreements run 15 to 20 years and are set to begin between 2029 and 2032. That is a substantial contracted backlog, but most of it is priced off future generation, not current output.

What is generating revenue right now? In Q2 2026, Constellation reported revenue of $7.504 billion with adjusted operating earnings of $2.55 per share. Management then raised full-year adjusted operating earnings guidance to $11.50 to $12.50 per share.

Constellation is not the only utility reshaping its revenue mix around long-term hyperscaler contracts. AEP signed a 20-year Google PPA for a 702 MW fuel cell facility, raising the question of which contracted utility offers the better entry point.

For today’s Q3 report, analysts forecast EPS of $3.88, a 27.6% increase year-over-year, on revenue of $9.35 billion, up 42.3% from the prior year. CEG has beaten EPS estimates 88% of the time and revenue estimates 75% of the time over the past two years. That track record makes a beat the base case, not the upside scenario.

The valuation math is where it gets interesting. Shares closed at $245.72 on November 4, with a 52-week range of $228.63 to $380.78. Twenty-five analysts carry an average Buy rating, with a 12-month consensus price target around $338, implying roughly 37% upside from that November 4 close. Morgan Stanley has pushed its target to $391.

The bear case rests entirely on timing. A PPA signed today for power arriving in 2031 earns nothing for five years. Regulatory approvals for uprates require NRC sign-off. PJM, the grid operator covering most of these deals, came up 6,831 megawatts short of its reliability requirement in its capacity auction for the 2028/29 delivery year. That supply gap is real, and it validates Constellation’s strategic position. But it also underscores how much execution must still occur before contracted megawatts become contracted dollars.

What today’s earnings call will tell investors is not whether the AI power theme is real. That is settled. The question is whether Constellation can grow current cash flows fast enough to bridge the interval between deal announcements and delivery dates without the stock rerating lower while it waits. If management addresses that gap directly, and the Q3 numbers hold, the discount may not last much longer.

More From Author

Could THIS be your biggest trading advantage?

Vir Biotechnology Has a Pivotal Win. Now It Needs to Beat Two Rivals to Market.

Live Market Pulse

The charting technology is provided by TradingView. Learn how to use theTradingView Stock Screener.